<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nature of Reading: Interpretation and Auteurism using Final Fantasy VIII and Mulholland Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegamecritique.com/recent-posts/the-nature-of-reading-interpretation-and-auteurism-using-final-fantasy-viii-and-mulholland-drive/2023/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegamecritique.com/recent-posts/the-nature-of-reading-interpretation-and-auteurism-using-final-fantasy-viii-and-mulholland-drive/2023/</link>
	<description>A Critical Assessment of Video Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Swain</title>
		<link>http://www.thegamecritique.com/recent-posts/the-nature-of-reading-interpretation-and-auteurism-using-final-fantasy-viii-and-mulholland-drive/2023/comment-page-1/#comment-20722</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Swain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegamecritique.com/?p=2023#comment-20722</guid>
		<description>Good work on missing the larger point of my post. Interpretation of a work cannot be factually wrong as if there is a single correct interpretation of a work. The more abstract the work, the more room for various interpretations there are.

You may not like or subscribe to a particular interpretation, but that does not make it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work on missing the larger point of my post. Interpretation of a work cannot be factually wrong as if there is a single correct interpretation of a work. The more abstract the work, the more room for various interpretations there are.</p>
<p>You may not like or subscribe to a particular interpretation, but that does not make it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squoll</title>
		<link>http://www.thegamecritique.com/recent-posts/the-nature-of-reading-interpretation-and-auteurism-using-final-fantasy-viii-and-mulholland-drive/2023/comment-page-1/#comment-20715</link>
		<dc:creator>squoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegamecritique.com/?p=2023#comment-20715</guid>
		<description>http://forums.eyesonff.com/final-fantasy-viii/129836-squalls-dead-spoilers-5.html

That theory really answers nothing, and it is factually wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://forums.eyesonff.com/final-fantasy-viii/129836-squalls-dead-spoilers-5.html" rel="nofollow">http://forums.eyesonff.com/final-fantasy-viii/129836-squalls-dead-spoilers-5.html</a></p>
<p>That theory really answers nothing, and it is factually wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

